y2k (9.2.2008 20:30:06)
Nebo se zrovna strefil ne jednu z adres tunelu PPP.
Martin (10.2.2008 08:30:21)
1
Martin (10.2.2008 08:31:59)
1
Martin (10.2.2008 08:32:08)
1
Martin (10.2.2008 08:34:12)
1
Martin (10.2.2008 08:34:27)
1
Martin (10.2.2008 11:17:58)
1
Martin (10.2.2008 11:18:10)
1
Martin (10.2.2008 11:18:51)
1
Martin (10.2.2008 11:21:45)
1
Martin (10.2.2008 11:21:52)
1
Martin (10.2.2008 18:30:55)
1
Zajda (24.3.2008 22:13:34)
Ale kedluben pane Nargone.
Because private addresses have no global meaning, routing information about private networks shall not be propagated on inter-enterprise links, and packets with private source or destination addresses should not be forwarded across such links. Routers in networks not using private address space, especially those of Internet service providers, are _expected_ _to_ be_ configured_ to_ reject_ (filter out)_ routing_ information_ about_ private_ networks_. If such a router receives such information the rejection shall not be treated as a routing protocol error.
Tolik vynatek z RFC1918.
Imho je to vazne neco(asi sitovy prvek) na siti poskytovatele. Vsechny routery po ceste ktere vas takhle smeruji se chovaji nekorektne a nemaji vas pustit. Nebo je nejaka nekonzistence v routovacich tabulkach ci bordel v natu a router na trase dostane jinou zdrojovou ip nez jaka by odpovidala privatnimu rozsahu a tim padem nevyfiltruje neplatnou ip. Proste je nekde neco spatne. Vzhledem k tomu ze se na nasem trhu vyrojila spousta pochybnych routeru nebo zarizeni se zasadnimi nedostatky v tcp/ip stacku, tak bych se nedivil ani tomuto faktu.
Ale to jsou jen urcite konspiracni teorie, nicmene zalozene na praxi;)